Build Your Own Race Car!Formula car logo

Contact UsHome

   An Internet Guide To Constructing Your Own Race Car.

Search Build Your
Own Race Car!

Select Option

  Design Strategies/Tips
      Study and Understand
     
Design Approaches
      Starting From The Rules
      Starting From Scratch
      Engineering Considerations
     
Part Requirements  
      Balancing Requirements

      Tips: Aerodynamics
      Tips: Chassis
      Tips: Suspension
      Tips: Safety/Ergonomics

  Design Software
  Sanctioned Design Rules
  Manufacturers
  Books, Magazines & Sites
  Feedback

Design Strategies

 

Engineering Considerations

As you design, it is important that you can gauge the requirements of your engineering work. The nature of the race car's normal operation and fatigue life depend on the structure and material composition of the car. Therefore, topics such as metallurgy and structural design are important for the designer to grasp.

The whole concept of engineering considerations is that you keep in mind four aspects, where they are appropriate:

Safety
Performance vs. Strength vs. Weight
Durability (Life)
Cost

If you can optimize all four of these aspects, to select a most appropriate component, or structure for your car, then you are already winning (or at least saving your neck)

Safety is a first consideration. If your car has proven safety, it will be a great confidence boost to the driver. Where appropriate, save your neck by using a quality solution.

Performance vs. Strength vs. Weight is another factor that applies to every component on a car

Durability comes into the picture mostly as a factor of weight penalty or cost.

And finally Cost represents the ultimate limiting factor on most everything. If you can't afford it, it doesn't matter how well it performs.

Each of the following sample questions ask the designer to address each of the four factors is some way, and to strike a balance between them.

Sample Questions About Engineering Considerations
What is the tortional rigidity of the chassis? Is it sufficient for the class you are running in? Can it be improved?

What is a front/side/rear impact going to do to the chassis, at specific speeds of impact.

Are sufficient anti-intrusion measures in place

Is the structural design of mounts for suspension, engine and drivetrain adequate for the loads they are to carry?

Is the safety roll bar adequate for protection?

Is the aerodynamic body design condusive to lift or to downforce? (Good to know, especially for high speed racing)

Is the body optimized for aerodynamics? Assuming the suspension and wheels are unchangeable, can any part of the body be changed, to improve aerodynamics? Don't break the rules, should you be using them.

Is the suspension free of bind?
Is the driveline clear of any obstructions or sensitive areas?

Does spring and damper selection reflect the conditions to be expected at various tracks?

What is the unsprung mass of the tire/wheel/suspension, and can it be improved within rule limits?
What are the electrical wiring requirements for the entire car? A final design should include wiring, in order to evaluate potential problems.
Are the most sensitive components of the car shielded adequately from elements and temperatures?
Are the driver ergonomics such that control operations are all adequate, for drivers of varying heights/weights? (or perhaps just your height/weight)?
Is the fuel cell compartment adequately designed to prevent fire from igniting fuel after a mechanical failure or accident-related impact?
Are the metallic and non-metallic materials used (especially in the engine bay), capable of withstanding the expected engine tempatures?

Are all the appropriate critical components safety wired?

Are all holes and cuts in metal properly designed so as to minimize crack propagation?
Is the driver safe from head banging protrusions?

This is just small example of the questions you will be able to answer, given a good study of engineering principles. You will be able to answer many more, assuming you spend a considerable amount of time getting aquainted with the knowledge.

On to "Part Requirements" >>

 

(c) 1999 Matt Gartner